Center for
Retirement Research
at Boston College
Hovey House
140 Commonwealth
Chestnut Hill
MA 02467-3808

617-552-1762 TEL
617-552-0191 FAX
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Web accessibility

 

Is CalPERS a Sovereign Wealth Fund?

December 2008

IB#8-21

Introduction

Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are the subject of intense debate.  While these funds are hard to define in precise terms, all agree they are government-sponsored pools of financial assets.  With roughly $3 trillion under management today and forecasts that suggest this number could approach $10 trillion in under a decade, many wonder what role these public investment funds will play in private markets. Due to SWFs’ government sponsorship, some fear that they will be used illegitimately to advance political, instead of commercial, agendas.  This geopolitical concern is compounded by a general lack of transparency and a perception among Western analysts of weak accountability and poor governance practices.

These fears are inspiring new rules designed to govern and regulate these institutions, and a series of new policy initiatives at the national and international level are in various stages of consideration and implementation. For example, the U.S. Congress has held hearings and established a taskforce to determine if SWFs are a threat that requires new regulation.  Australia and Germany have enacted new rules that address SWF investments.  The International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds, with the assistance of the IMF, has developed the voluntary ‘generally accepted principles and practices’ for SWFs (also known as the Santiago Principles)...

For full paper in PDF

For more information on State and Local Pension Plans

Ashby H. B. Monk is a research fellow at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) and the University of Oxford.  The author would like to thank Beth Almeida, Gordon L. Clark, Courtney Monk, Andrew Rozanov, Benn Steil, Edwin Truman, and Juan Yermo for comments on a previous draft.