The Annuity Puzzle and Negative Framing
IB#8-10
Introduction
For years, researchers have been puzzled by why so few people purchase fixed, immediate, lifetime annuities for their retirement portfolios. Rational theories have been proposed, but none can fully explain the small size of the actual market. Very recently, academics have turned their attention to possible psychological reasons for the low demand. Interestingly, despite the well-established role psychology plays in other important retirement decisions — for example, 401(k) participation — the behavioral finance aspects of the retirement distribution phase have been largely understudied. In addition, finance researchers are realizing how much can be learned from the established field of marketing, where the role of psychological biases in all types of decisionmaking has been long understood. This brief discusses how marketing, and in particular the framing of the message, can affect a purchaser’s decision to buy an annuity. This decision is becoming increasingly important given the shift to 401(k) plans, as individuals will need to determine how best to manage their accumulated nest egg in retirement.
For full paper in PDF
Julie R. Agnew is an assistant professor of economics and finance at The College of William & Mary’s Mason School of Business and a research associate of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Lisa R. Anderson is a professor of economics at William & Mary. Jeffrey R. Gerlach is an assistant professor of finance at the SKK Graduate School of Business in Seoul, South Korea. Lisa R. Szykman is an associate professor of marketing at William & Mary’s Mason School of Business. The authors wish to thank the FINRA Investor Education Foundation for their very generous support of the research on which this brief is based.


