Center for
Retirement Research
at Boston College
Hovey House
140 Commonwealth
Chestnut Hill
MA 02467-3808

617-552-1762 TEL
617-552-0191 FAX
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Web accessibility

 

Tags:
Click to add your tags...,
Working Wives Reduce Social Security Replacement Rates Print E-mail
by Alicia H. Munnell, Geoffrey Sanzenbacher, and Mauricio Soto

IB#7-15

Introduction 

The general perception is that the Social Security program expanded significantly in the 1970s and today benefits are much higher relative to pre-retirement earnings than they were prior to that expansion.  Indeed, the Social Security Trustees Report shows that the replacement rate — benefits as a percent of pre-retirement earnings — for the average worker rose from about 30 percent in 1970 to about 40 percent in 1980, where it remains today. 

Most people, however, retire as married couples, sharing and replacing a common household income.  Thus, to understand the role of Social Security in the nation’s retirement income system, it thus is crucial to consider the replacement rate of couples — as opposed to single individuals — and how that rate has changed over time.  Indeed, the increasing labor force participation of married women has led to a significant reduction in the replacement rates for couples.  Combining the rising replacement rates for individual workers with the declining replacement rates for couples shows the 1970s expansion of Social Security to be less dramatic than generally thought...

For full paper in PDF

 

Alicia H. Munnell is the Director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) and the Peter F. Drucker Professor of Management Sciences at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management.  Geoffrey Sanzenbacher is a graduate research assistant at the CRR.  Mauricio Soto is a research economist at the CRR.  The authors would like to thank Michael Clingman and Orlo Nichols for very helpful comments.  Of course, the findings and conclusions expressed in this brief are solely those of the authors. 

 

Tags: Briefs, Social Security,
Click to add your tags...,