A New Approach to Raising Social Security's Earliest Eligibility Age
WP#2007-19
Abstract
While Social Security’s Normal Retirement Age (NRA) is increasing to 67, the Earliest Eligibility Age (EEA) remains at 62. Similar plans to increase the EEA raise concerns that they would create excessive hardship on workers that are worn-out or in bad health. One simple rule to increase the EEA is to tie an increase to the number of quarters of covered earnings. Such a provision would allow those with long worklives — presumably the less educated and lower paid — to quit earlier. We provide evidence that this simple rule would not satisfy the goal of preventing undue hardship on certain workers. Thus, this paper considers an alternative policy that ties an increase in the EEA to individuals’ Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME). We show that allowing workers with low AIME to continue to be eligible to receive benefits at age 62 has promise as a policy to protect workers who have low earnings and are in poor health from hardship associated with an increase in the EEA.
For executive summary in PDF
For full paper in PDF
For related Issue in Brief
Kelly Haverstick is a research economist at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR). Margarita Sapozhnikov is a graduate research assistant at the CRR. Robert Triest is a visiting scholar at the CRR. Natalia Zhivan is a graduate research assistant at the CRR.


