Center for
Retirement Research
at Boston College
Hovey House
140 Commonwealth
Chestnut Hill
MA 02467-3808

617-552-1762 TEL
617-552-0191 FAX
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Web accessibility

 

Aggregate Implications of Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Systems

by Francisco Gomes and Alexander Michaelides September 2003

WP#2003-16  

Abstract 

We use a general equilibrium life-cycle model with incomplete markets and heterogeneous agents to evaluate the macroeconomic and welfare implications of Defined Benefit (DB) versus Defined Contribution (DC) systems, and to investigate the effects of incremental reform within a particular system. Extensive calibrations illustrate the trade-off between effciency and redistribution that a tax-financed, DB social security system generates. We find that social welfare is maximized for small but positive levels of DB because of the redistributive value associated with these systems. On the other hand, steady-state within-DC system comparisons reveal that a zero DC tax rate maximizes social welfare.

For executive summary in PDF

For full paper in PDF 

Francisco Gomes is a professor at the London Business School. Alexander Michaelides is a lecturer at the London School of Economics. The authors would like to thank John Laitner, David Webb and Steve Zeldes for helpful discussions and seminar participants at the University of Cyprus and the UBS Asset Management pensions seminar at the LSE for helpful suggestions. The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR). The opinions and conclusions are solely those of the author and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of SSA or any agency of the Federal Government or of the CRR. The author would like to thank Misuzu Azuma for excellent research assistance.