Center for
Retirement Research
at Boston College
Hovey House
140 Commonwealth
Chestnut Hill
MA 02467-3808

617-552-1762 TEL
617-552-0191 FAX
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Web accessibility

 

Tags:
Click to add your tags...,

It's All Relative: Understanding the Retirement Prospects of Baby-Boomers

by Barbara A. Butrica, Howard M. Iams, and Karen E. Smith

WP#2003-21  

Abstract 

The aim of this paper is to compare baby boomer retirees with previous generations on their overall level, distribution, and composition of family income and on the adequacy of this income in maintaining their economic well- being in retirement. To do this we use projections of retirement income from the Social Security Administration’s Modeling of Income in the Near Term (MINT) data system.

In absolute terms, measured by real per capita income and poverty rates, we find that baby boomers will be better off than current retirees. In relative terms, however, many baby boomers will be worse off than current retirees. First, MINT predicts changes over time in the relative ranking of important subgroups within specific cohorts, with some subgroups experiencing substantial gains in real per capita income and other subgroups experiencing little gain over time. Second, while both pre- and post-retirement incomes are rising, post-retirement incomes don’t rise as much as pre-retirement incomes. Consequently, baby boomers are less likely than current retirees to have enough post-retirement income to maintain their preretirement living standards. These findings hold up to various definitions of family income and replacement rates.

For executive summary in PDF

For full paper in PDF 

Barbara A. Butrica and Karen E. Smith are senior research associates at the Urban Institute. Howard M. Iams is the director of the Division of Policy Evaluation at the Social Security Administration. The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR). The opinions and conclusions are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of SSA or any agency of the Federal Government or of the CRR, or of the Urban Institute, its board, or its funders. The authors are grateful to Rich Johnson and Sheila Zedlewski for valuable comments.
Tags: Savings and Consumption, Working Papers,
Click to add your tags...,