Differential Crowd-Out and Retirement Lock among the Elderly by Risk Aversion: Evidence from Medicare Part D

by Gal Wettstein, Harvard University

This project uses Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data around the time of introduction of Medicare Part D prescription drug insurance for the elderly in order to estimate crowd-out of private prescription drug insurance, and employer-provided drug benefits’ retirement-lock effects. I will use individuals between ages 55-64, who are not eligible for the program, as a control group relative to individuals ages 65-75, who are eligible. Through comparing outcomes before and after 2006, when Medicare Part D went into effect, I will take a differences-indifferences approach to estimation. By exploiting unique questions eliciting risk aversion in the HRS, I will estimate differential crowd-out effects by different risk aversion values. Based upon these estimates and differential use of employer-provided drug insurance among low- and high-risk aversion individuals, I will estimate the magnitude of retirement-lock due to employer-provision of prescription drug benefits. These estimates will also account for risk-aversion heterogeneity in the impact of a public insurance option on retirement decisions. Integrating these empirical results with a model of welfare from public insurance in the presence of a pre-existing private insurance market, I will estimate the welfare implications of Medicare Part D.

Back to 2015 Dissertation Fellowship Recipients

The CRR wants to hear from our website users like you. Would be you willing to take a short survey?

Yes, take me to it.       No, thanks.      Not now, but ask me later.