Oregon’s Retirement IRA is Making Progress
Left to their own devices, Americans who lack a retirement savings plan at work do not usually take the initiative to set up an IRA and save on their own.
Oregon lawmakers decided to do something about that, and a new study finds that their approach of requiring employers without a plan to automatically enroll their workers in a state-sponsored IRA is reaching the right people.
Nationwide, lower-income workers are much less likely to have a retirement plan, and the typical employee enrolled in the program, OregonSaves, earns only $22,600. They also tend to work in high-turnover industries like food service and healthcare where constant job changes make it difficult to save consistently. When an Oregon worker finds another job in the state, he can take his IRA with him to the next employer.
Private-sector 401(k)s with auto-enrollment match some of the workers’ contributions and have nearly universal participation. In OregonSaves, the share of people with positive account balances in their IRAs, which don’t have a match, is lower.
But these are the types of workers who don’t usually save, and the vast majority told their employers they had not been saving prior to being enrolled in OregonSaves. The program “has meaningfully increased employee savings,” concluded a new study funded by the U.S. Social Security Administration.
At the end of May, the average balance in about 114,000 IRA accounts was $1,324. The employees have saved a total of $151 million.
Auto-enrollment gets these low-paid workers into the IRA. But an important reason they choose not to opt out – as they are permitted to do at any time – is that they’ve probably known they should be saving for retirement and OregonSaves made it easier.
The employer enrolls them and deducts 5 percent from their paychecks, and the money is invested automatically, eliminating barriers the researchers call “search costs.” This is the time and effort needed to learn about IRAs, open an account at a financial institution, and figure out how to invest it.
Data on program activity between 2017 and early 2020 shows who is benefitting. Young adults unfamiliar with retirement planning are the least likely people to opt out of their IRAs. So are employees who had learned about the program in previous jobs and have gotten comfortable with the concept.
The researchers said the workers who do opt out “are often doing so for rational reasons.” About 24 percent of them said they already have a retirement plan. But nearly 30 percent said that they “can’t afford to save at this time.”
Indeed, this reason makes sense for low-income workers with severe financial straits. And that’s a tough problem that auto-enrollment won’t crack.
To read this study, authored by John Chalmers, Olivia Mitchell, Jonathan Reuter, and Mingli Zhong, see “Auto-enrollment Retirement Plans in OregonSaves.” See also “Do State-Sponsored Retirement Plans Boost Retirement Saving?” by the same authors.
The research reported herein was derived in whole or in part from research activities performed pursuant to a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) funded as part of the Retirement and Disability Research Consortium. The opinions and conclusions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the opinions or policy of SSA, any agency of the federal government, or Boston College. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the contents of this report. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Comments are closed.
I hope that this works for them. All it takes is a little initiative (as the lead-in paragraph mentions). Much of what ails us falls into the same category.
Keep in mind that if a private sector employer offered OregonSaves, or CalSavers, the plan sponsor, administrator and investment fiduciary would all likely face legal challenges for violating their ERISA fiduciary duties.
OregonSaves likely gets a passing grade, as more people are saving, but a D-. At this point, OregonSaves might want to consider action to encourage/refer/transfer program participants and their IRA assets to a better IRA alternative.
See:
https://401kspecialistmag.com/calsavers-is-similar-to-oregonsaves-and-suboptimal-opinion/ (including two links to evaluations of the OregonSaves program)
I am glad that our Oregon lawmakers are taking the right direction in IRA retirements for the community. This is a good article, thanks for sharing.