Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Advanced Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us

There Are Only Two Ways to Fix Social Security: Cut Benefits or Increase Revenues

February 22, 2023
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Raising the ‘full retirement age’ is not a third option — it is a benefit cut.

The debate about Social Security has begun.  That’s perfectly appropriate.  The system is running a 75-year deficit, and the assets in the Trust Fund, which are temporally filling the gap between revenues and promised benefits, are projected to be depleted in 2035.  After they are depleted, revenues will be sufficient to cover only about three quarters of scheduled outlays.  So, we have to do something.

At its core, Social Security is a simple program that essentially operates on a pay-as-you-go basis.  (Yes, the trust fund accumulated assets in the wake of the 1983 amendments, but, as noted, those reserves are about to be depleted.)  It is essentially a money-in /money-out operation.  Currently we have more money going out than coming in.  To get the system in balance we need to increase the money going in or reduce the money going out.  Reducing the money going out means cutting benefits.

Some people suggest that a third option exists for restoring balance to the program: increase the Full Retirement Age (FRA).  Indeed, increasing the FRA from its current 67 to 70 could eliminate about a third of the 75-year deficit.  But increasing the Full Retirement Age is not a third option; it is a benefit cut. 

Just to be absolutely clear, increasing Social Security’s FRA is not just a question of “postponing” claiming.  Those who are able to delay retirement receive one less year of benefits.  Those who cannot adjust their retirement behavior get lower benefits due to the increased actuarial adjustment – an adjustment made to keep lifetime benefits constant regardless of claiming age.  Currently, those claiming at age 62 receive only 70 percent of the benefit available at 67.  If the Full Retirement Age were increased to 70, that amount falls to 55 percent. 

I’m against any form of benefit cut, because the rest of the U.S. retirement system seems quite wobbly to me.  At any moment, only about half of private sector workers are covered by any type of workplace retirement plan.  That means some people never are covered and are totally reliant on Social Security, while others move in and out of coverage and end up with modest balances.  Moreover, increasing the FRA is the most pernicious form of benefit cut, because it hurts the most vulnerable who are forced to claim early.

Despite my conviction that we should not cut benefits, I think I could have a reasonable discussion with those on the other side of the benefit-cut/revenue-increase debate.  But those who try to pretend that increasing the FRA is not a benefit cut make me crazy. 

If we are going to move forward, we at least have to label the proposed changes to Social Security correctly.  Trying to trick people into thinking that they are not being hurt by an increase in the FRA is not a legitimate way to make policy.  

Silhouette of scale with coins
Silhouette of scale with coins
Author(s)
Headshot of Alicia H. Munnell
Alicia H. Munnell
Topics
Social Security
Publication
MarketWatch Blog
Related content

Read on MarketWatch

Related Articles
magnifier on graph on working desk

Now Is the Time to Rethink How Social Security Should Be Financed

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

April 25, 2023
Front view of Social Security office

Social Security’s Financial Outlook: The 2023 Update in Perspective

Issue Brief by Alicia H. Munnell

April 25, 2023
Wooden figures on different size coin stacks

There Are Only Two Ways to Fix Social Security: Part Two

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

February 28, 2023
About us
Contact
Join email list
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube RSS

© 2023 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT