Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us
  • Search

Immigration Reform and Social Security

August 5, 2013
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

Headshot of Alicia H. Munnell

Alicia H. Munnell is a columnist for MarketWatch and senior advisor of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

The Senate-passed bill would improve the program’s finances

I am an unabashed supporter of immigration reform.  The status quo doesn’t work; we need a better system.  My view is that the case stands on its own merits.  But for those looking for additional rationales, the recent analysis from the Social Security Actuaries of Senate Bill S.744, which was passed by the Senate on June 27, might help.  

The analysis shows that the proposed legislation would have a beneficial effect on the Social Security program’s finances – extending the date of exhaustion of trust fund reserves from 2033 to 2035; increasing the percent of benefits payable after exhaustion to 79 percent; and reducing the actuarial deficit from 2.72 percent to 2.51 percent of taxable payrolls.

The Senate bill would do the following:

  • Enhance border security and establish a mandatory system of employment verification for all persons newly hired.  Social Security estimates that this provision will result in almost 500,000 fewer undocumented immigrants entering the country each year. 
  • Establish a new Registered Provisional Immigrant status permitting undocumented individuals residing in the United States since December 31, 2011 to gain immediate legal work status, with an opportunity to become legal permanent residents after 5 to 10 years.  Social Security estimates nearly 8 million individuals will apply for and receive this status. 
  • Expand and establish several categories of temporary visas, ultimately increasing the annual number of such visas granted by nearly 400,000. 
  • Eliminate backlogs of applicants for permanent legal immigration in limited categories, adding about 5 million legal permanent residents over the next 10 years. 
  • Expand limits for future legal permanent immigration, ultimately by about 400,000 per year. 

Overall, the Social Security Actuaries estimate that the legislation would ultimately increase net annual total immigration by about 200,000.  Net legal immigration would be increased by about 300,000 per year, net undocumented immigration would be reduced by over 150,000, and net immigration through temporary visas would be increased by over 50,000 per year. 

The legislation through about 2060 would substantially reduce Social Security costs expressed as a percent of taxable payroll as a result of increased taxable earnings.  Between 2061 and 2075, it would increase costs very slightly as the millions of individuals granted Registered Provisional Immigrant status and Legal Permanent Resident status from the reduction of backlogs over the next several years move from working age to retirement age.  After 2074, the legislation would again reduce costs as increased new legal immigration, and the added births to additional immigrants, expand the labor force and shift the age distribution of the population to somewhat younger ages.   

So if people – more specifically, members of the House of Representatives – need an additional reason to support the Senate immigration reform bill, here it is.  Immigration reform will help Social Security.

June,1,,2019,,Brazil.,In,This,Photo,Illustration,The,Social
June,1,,2019,,Brazil.,In,This,Photo,Illustration,The,Social
Downloads
PDF Version
Related Content

Read on MarketWatch

Topics
Social Security
Publication Type
MarketWatch Blog
Related Articles
Cheerful young colleagues indoors coworking

401(k) Tax Subsidy and Matches Favor Higher Earners, Often White

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

May 8, 2025
Magnifying glass over wooden people on a gray background

Measuring the Potential Impact of Broadening Social Security's Revenue Base

Working Paper by Karen E. Smith and Richard W. Johnson

April 28, 2025
Gray haired woman old man analyzing laptop screen computer monitor at home on sofa

Tax Credit Reduces Disabilities Among Older Workers

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

April 24, 2025

Support timely research that informs real-world solutions.

About us
Contact
Join e-mail list
Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube RSS

© 2025 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT