Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us
  • Search

The Notional Defined Contribution Model: An Assessment of the Strengths and Limitations of a New Approach to Provision of Old Age Security

October 1, 2003
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn

Working Paper by John B. Williamson and Matthew Williams

Abstract

Most public old-age pension schemes around the world are based at least in part on the pay-as-you-go defined benefit (PAYGO DB) model. As these schemes have matured and the limitations of this approach have become more salient, pension experts have begun considering alternative models. The Notional Defined Contribution (NDC) model, which is also financed on a PAYGO basis, has emerged as one of the major new approaches. In the years ahead it may be combined with or possibly displace the funded defined contribution model as the major alternative to the PAYGO DB model. Drawing primarily on evidence from NDC schemes in 6 countries (Sweden, Italy, Poland, Latvia, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Mongolia), the goal of this paper is to describe the NDC model and to review its strengths and limitations relative to the major alternatives. A four pillar pension scheme is proposed to illustrate how a NDC pillar might be integrated into a multi-pillar scheme. One strength (relative to the PAYGO DB model) is that it makes a more explicit link between contributions and eventual pension benefits; however, the flip-side of this strength is that it provides less adequate pension benefits to low-wage workers due to the lack of income redistribution. The fiscal burden of the transition is less than that associated with a shift to a funded defined contribution scheme, but NDC schemes lack many of the potential economic benefits associated with funded defined contribution schemes, such as contributing to economic growth. The NDC model may become common among the nations in the process of making the transition from centrally planned to market economies, among Western European nations, and among developing nations. It is less likely to be adopted in nations that currently have fully or partially privatized schemes in place. In the United States, the model will probably get relatively little attention in the debate over Social Security reform, at least for the foreseeable future. However, it is a model that would put workers with low wages and irregular work histories at less risk than the funded defined contribution alternative being actively considered in current debates about Social Security reform in the United States.

Cheerful senior man at home looking at his mail
Cheerful senior man at home looking at his mail
Author(s)
Headshot of John B. Williamson
John B. Williamson
Headshot of Matthew Williams
Matthew Williams
Downloads
PDF Version
Executive Summary
Citation

Williamson, and Matthew Williams. 2003. "The Notional Defined Contribution Model: An Assessment of the Strengths and Limitations of a New Approach to Provision of Old Age Security" Working Paper 2003-18. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Copy citation to clipboard
Topics
Social Security
Publication Type
Working Paper
Publication Number
WP#2003-18
Related Content
For related Issue in Brief
Related Articles
Multiple wooden blocks with people's silhouettes on them

Don’t Bring Back Traditional Private Sector Defined Benefit Plans

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

October 16, 2024
School teacher with students

What Role Does State Government Play in Funding Teacher Pensions?

Issue Brief by Jean-Pierre Aubry

September 24, 2024
Above photo of keyboard calculator notebook clipboard pen piggybank and glasses isolated on wooden backdrop-min

Do State and Local Pension Plans Really Need to Be Fully Funded?

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

April 18, 2023

Support timely research that informs real-world solutions.

About us
Contact
Join e-mail list
Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube RSS

© 2025 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT