Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Advanced Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us

The Treatment of Married Women by the Social Security Retirement Program

November 22, 2010
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the Social Security program pays women a higher average ratio of lifetime benefits to lifetime taxes than it does men. Social Security’s progressive benefit structure and annuity payment combine with women’s lower average earnings and longer average life spans to provide women with more favorable treatment on a lifetime basis. This more favorable treatment does not necessarily imply that women are presented with stronger incentives to participate in the labor force and contribute to Social Security than are men. If anything, Social Security does the opposite.  The auxiliary benefit provisions, including spousal and widow’s benefits, mean that many women do not receive higher benefits in return for their contributions than they would have received had they never worked or contributed to the program…

Their finances are in the green
Their finances are in the green
Author(s)
Headshot of Andrew G. Biggs
Andrew G. Biggs
Headshot of Gayle L. Reznik
Gayle L. Reznik
Headshot of Nada O. Eissa
Nada O. Eissa
Downloads
PDF Version
Executive Summary
Citation

Biggs, Andrew G., Gayle L. Reznik and Nada O. Eissa. 2010. "The Treatment of Married Women by the Social Security Retirement Program" Working Paper 2010-18. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Copy citation to clipboard
Associated Project(s)
  • BC10-05
Topics
Social Security
Publication
Working Paper
Publication Number
WP#2010-18
Related Articles
iStock-1419600851

It Can be Tough to Stretch Social Security Over a Month

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

May 16, 2023
new background

What’s Next for U.S. Birth Rates?

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

May 11, 2023
Smashed piggy bank

Senators Cassidy and King Have a Plan for Saving Social Security

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

May 8, 2023
About us
Contact
Join email list
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube RSS

© 2023 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT