Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us
  • Search

How to Pay for Social Security’s Missing Trust Fund?

December 19, 2017
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn

Working Paper by Alicia H. Munnell, Wenliang Hou, and Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher

Abstract

Social Security’s Trust Fund is projected to run out in 2034.  As policymakers consider restoring financial balance to the program, one topic that may be discussed is how to structure any tax increases.  Understanding why Social Security requires a higher payroll tax than a funded retirement program for a given level of benefits is a crucial first step in informing this discussion.  The current “pay-as-you-go” approach is the result of the policy decision made decades ago to pay benefits far in excess of contributions for early cohorts of workers.  By paying benefits in excess of contributions to early cohorts, the nation essentially gave away the Trust Fund that would have accumulated and, importantly, gave away the interest on those contributions.  Thus, the payroll tax must cover not only the required contribution but also the missing interest.  This paper addresses alternative ways to pay for this Missing Trust Fund, including a comparison of the size of the required changes and their distributional implications.

This paper found that:

  • The size of the OASI Missing Trust Fund is $27 trillion dollars.
  • The so-called Legacy Debt – i.e., the $29.3 trillion dollar net transfer to pre-1932 birth cohorts – is the driver of this Missing Trust Fund.
  • Paying for the missing interest on this Missing Trust Fund could be accomplished with a permanent increase in the capped payroll tax of 3.7 percentage points, in an uncapped payroll tax of 3.0 percentage points, or in the income tax of 2.3 percentage points.
  • Accumulating assets to replace the Missing Trust Fund over 75 years requires larger, temporary increases in those taxes of 6.5 percentage points, 5.3 percentage points, and 4.1 percentage points, respectively.
  • The burden of a payroll tax increase tends to fall more on households in the middle two income quartiles, whereas the income tax burden falls more on the top quartile.

 
The policy implications of this paper are:

  • The fact that the primary cause of the Missing Trust Fund is the Legacy Debt suggests that increasing the income tax merits consideration, since paying benefits to early program participants benefited all of society.
  • While replacing the Missing Trust Fund would ultimately create a fully funded system with a large, interest-generating Trust Fund, such a move raises macroeconomic issues and questions of intergenerational equity.
  • Finding the right approach merits society-wide discussion.
Their finances are in the green
Their finances are in the green
Author(s)
Headshot of Alicia H. Munnell
Alicia H. Munnell
Headshot of Wenliang Hou
Wenliang Hou
Headshot of Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
Downloads
PDF Version
Figure .xls file
Citation

Munnell, Alicia H., Wenliang Hou, and Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher. 2017. "How to Pay for Social Security’s Missing Trust Fund?" Working Paper 2017-18. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Copy citation to clipboard
Other Project Publications
  • Issue Brief
Associated Project(s)
  • BC17-02
Topics
Social Security
Publication Type
Working Paper
Publication Number
WP#2017-18
Sponsor
U.S. Social Security Administration
Related Content

For related Issue in Brief

Related Articles
Social Security sign in a garden

The Implications of Social Security’s “Missing Trust Fund”

Issue Brief by Alicia H. Munnell, Wenliang Hou, and Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher

June 4, 2019
United States capitol in Washington DC with a Social Security card and money

Here’s a Proposal to Fix Social Security that We Could Enact Today

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

January 29, 2025
Close up of person's hands typing on a laptop overlayed with graphics of tax, money, bulls eye, maginifying glass, etc.

A Social Security Payroll Tax Increase Should Be Part of the Solution

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

December 17, 2024

Support timely research that informs real-world solutions.

About us
Contact
Join e-mail list
Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube RSS

© 2025 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT