Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us
  • Search

Are Early Claimers Making a Mistake?

July 26, 2016
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn

Working Paper by Alicia H. Munnell, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher, Anthony Webb, and Christopher M. Gillis

Abstract

Using Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data and Latent Class Analysis for three cohorts (those born in 1931-1936, 1937-1941, and 1942-1947), this paper explores: 1) who claims Social Security benefits at age 62; 2) what percentage of households claiming at 62 are unprepared for retirement; and 3) whether the unprepared early claimers were pushed into claiming through job shocks and/or poor health or simply decided to take benefits early.   Looking across three cohorts makes it possible to see whether these patterns have changed as the average claim age has increased and pension coverage has shifted away from defined benefit (DB) plans.  That is, have those who have moved out of age-62 claiming been educated, financially prepared households or unprepared households that have recognized the need to delay claiming?

The paper found that:

  • Consistent with previous research, the HRS shows a decline in those claiming at 62.
  • Age-62 claimers are less well off than “postponers” in some ways and better off in others.
  • Latent class analysis shows that this mixed picture reflects the average of: 1) those with little education and poor job prospects (disadvantaged); and 2) those with at least some college and sufficient resources to claim early (advantaged).
  • The percentage of the age-62 claimers in each of these groups has remained virtually constant over the three cohorts.
  • Comparing the calculated household replacement rates with target rates from previous research shows that, overall, roughly 65 percent of households claiming at 62 are not prepared; the rate for the disadvantaged group is twice the rate of the advantaged group.
  • The percentage unprepared at 62 has increased over time, reflecting an overall trend toward less preparedness.
  • A simple probit regression suggests that health and employment shocks and the absence of a DB pension are related to the lack of preparedness for both the disadvantaged and advantaged.

 
The policy implications of the findings are:

  • Given the increasing trend in unpreparedness, further cuts to Social Security benefits would exacerbate this problem.
  • Workers claiming at 62 with DB plans were especially likely to be prepared; these plans are not coming back, so the challenge is whether the 401(k) system can be enhanced.
Cheerful senior man at home looking at his mail
Cheerful senior man at home looking at his mail
Author(s)
Headshot of Alicia H. Munnell
Alicia H. Munnell
Headshot of Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
Headshot of Anthony Webb
Anthony Webb
Headshot of Christopher M. Gillis
Christopher M. Gillis
Downloads
PDF Version
Figure .xls file
Citation

Munnell, Alicia H., Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher, Anthony Webb, and Christopher M. Gillis. 2016. "Are Early Claimers Making a Mistake?" Working Paper 2016-5. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Copy citation to clipboard
Associated Project(s)
  • BC16-01
Topics
Social Security
Education
Publication Type
Working Paper
Publication Number
WP#2016-5
Sponsor
U.S. Social Security Administration
Related Articles
Cheerful young colleagues indoors coworking

401(k) Tax Subsidy and Matches Favor Higher Earners, Often White

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

May 8, 2025
Senior couple sitting on the floor of a family room with luggage packing for a trip

Will the Average Retirement Age Keep Rising?

Issue Brief by Alicia H. Munnell

April 15, 2025
payment due

Workers on Federal Disability Often Exceed Earnings Cap

Squared Away Blog by Kimberly Blanton

February 13, 2025

Support timely research that informs real-world solutions.

About us
Contact
Join e-mail list
Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube RSS

© 2025 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT