Skip to content
CRR logo
Submit Search
Join E-mail List | Contact Us
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Initiatives
  • Data
  • Sponsors
  • Opportunities
  • About Us
  • Search

This Trend Has Important Implications for Social Security’s Full Retirement Age

February 25, 2025
Share
Mobile Share Email Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

Headshot of Alicia H. Munnell

Alicia H. Munnell is a columnist for MarketWatch and senior advisor of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

New data show strong relationship between earnings and life expectancy.

As part of its review of a recent proposal, the Social Security actuaries provided another contribution to the extensive body of evidence showing that life expectancy is positively related to income and that the gap between those at the top and the bottom of the income distribution has increased over time.  This pattern is of crucial importance when considering the progressivity of the Social  Security program and any proposal to increase the program’s full retirement age. 

The numbers released by Social Security are based on the records of all workers – not sample populations as in most other studies, but are not as spectacular as results reported by other researchers for a couple of reasons.  First, these calculations exclude all workers who received benefits under the disability insurance program – a low-earning group with low life expectancy who would have reduced the bottom quintile estimate even more.   Second, unlike earlier studies that looked at life expectancy at age 50, these numbers pertain to life expectancy at age 62; eliminating those who die between 50 and 62 produces a healthier group overall.  Despite these positive biases, the pattern remains (see Table 1).  Life expectancy rises systematically with earnings, and the gap has been widening.

Table showing Life Expectancy of Men at Age 62 by Quintile of Average Indexed Monthly Earnings

This pattern has important implications for the progressivity of the Social Security system.  A key goal of the program is to redistribute income from high earners to low earners through a progressive benefit formula that replaces a higher percentage of low earnings.  The gap in life expectancy undermines that effort because low earners receive benefits for 10 years less than high earners.

The relationship between life expectancy and earnings also has important implications regarding proposals to increase the full retirement age in response to the overall increase in longevity.  Yes, life expectancy has increased overall from 18.1 years for men born in 1930 to 20.9 years for men born in 1960.  But the gains for the top 20 percent were more than twice as great as those for the bottom 20 percent, and the difference between the two groups increased so that men in the top now can be expected to live 10 years longer than men at the bottom (see Figure 1).  That is, men in the bottom 20 percent of the earnings distribution are expected to live to about 77, whereas men in the top are projected to live to about 88.

Bar graph showing the Difference in Life Expectancy between Men in the Lowest and Highest Quintile, by Cohort

Because of this huge discrepancy in life expectancy, I really like Wendell Primus’ proposal to increase the full retirement age only for those who can really work longer.  Under the plan scored by the actuaries, only the top 20 percent of each cohort would see an increase in the retirement age to 70, gradually phased in over time.  Those with earnings below the 60th percentile would see no change.  For those with earnings between the 60th and 80th percentiles, the increase would be scaled.    

Not only would this sensible change in the full retirement age eliminate 16 percent of the 75-year deficit, it would also restore some power to the progressive benefit formula by helping to equalize the period over which low and high earners receive benefits. 

The question that remains in my mind relates to the mechanics.  People need some warning about the age at which they can claim full benefits.  If the calculation of expected lifetime earnings were done at age 50, would that provide an accurate projection?  Would age 55 be better?  What type of worker might be miscategorized?  This proposal needs a little fleshing out, but it has promise. 

Two miniature men walking toward a stack of coins of different heights
Two miniature men walking toward a stack of coins of different heights
Downloads
PDF Version
Related Content

Read on MarketWatch

Topics
Social Security
Publication Type
MarketWatch Blog
Related Articles
United States capitol in Washington DC with a Social Security card and money

Here’s a Proposal to Fix Social Security that We Could Enact Today

MarketWatch Blog by Alicia H. Munnell

January 29, 2025
Miniature old people walking on the graph. The concept of an aging society.

How Has the Variance of Longevity Changed Over Time?

Working Paper by Gal Wettstein and Yimeng Yin

January 7, 2025
Older couple enjoying a sunny walk by the sea

How Has the Variance of Longevity Changed Over Time?

Issue Brief by Gal Wettstein and Yimeng Yin

January 7, 2025

Support timely research that informs real-world solutions.

About us
Contact
Join e-mail list
Facebook Bluesky Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube RSS

© 2025 Trustees of Boston College, Center for Retirement Research|Terms of Use|Privacy Policy|Accessibility

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We also use IP addresses, domain information and other access statistics to administer the site and analyze usage trends. If you prefer to opt out, you can select Update settings. Read our Privacy Policy. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT